Tweet
shaolin is wonderous but skill decides the victor
it will seem ridiculous to some that shaolin has metaphysical properties of healing and harming sometimes with no physical contact made. one such skill is the one finger zen or yi zhi chan obviously a skill like this would be an excellent answer to all martial arts grapplers and kungfu experts included. if a grappler were to train tiger claw it would greatly enhance his grappling so separation is not necessarily key to victory however kungfu has the largest repertoire of throws and grappling techniques found in the world today they are not as often in kungfu sparring but this is partially due to the lack of real kungfu today.
im not certain but would a grappler admit that twisting the neck of a person trying to shoot would be sufficient to secure victory?(a grapplers shoot not a gun shoot lol)
ufc fighters could beat me, ufc fighters could especially fight me in there rule based surroundings but give me a few years , i'm 18 now, and i may enter the ufc. skills that they are unaccustomed too would include iron leg iron arm iron head things that i practice and of course internal force great enough to do things that i feel no need to comment on but i assure you are if nothing else baffling. the problem it seems is people are to caught up on if kungfu is better. whats the gauge?
if the gauge is completeness then kungfu is the most complete; it features more of everything. from skills to grappling tecniques to jumping high if you so desire kungfu is the most complete including twelve punching techniques more than any other art 12 throws 36 kicks 32 elbow attacks 118 joint locks you could go on and on.
is the scale its purpose? then kungfu is superior because its not only for fighting if this was the only point then carry a gun self defense would be yours to have.
is your gauge the fastest strike or the strongest grip or is it who can more effectively perform a kata or get into the mount position?
regardless of the gauge or scale for measuring you have to understand because of the unbroken chinese cultural timeline and a culture revolving around fighting arts it becomes easy to see that chinese arts would be more advanced. but talking about it means nothing. not wanting to brag i wont say how long each day but shaolin is my life i am an amateur instructor and thus i must stay on the top of my game for my students which means quite alot of training. one thing any good fighter needs is passion regardless of the fighting style.
i guess one good gauge is to say if your opponent is not vastly superior which art will give you a higher chance of surviving, then thats kungfu hands down. in the basic 16 combat sequences of shaolin wahnam in fact in the first two sequences you find two fatal attacks; a heart strike and a throat or eye strike. if you are met with a unwitting even martial arts opponent and you strike his throat then you most certainly would win that leads me to me practice shaolin.
if any grappler trained in kungfu it could only help their grappling and the reverse is also true because training is training however i wouldnt do bjj because i already have from the time i was six till i was twelve and kungfu answers to the bjj tecniques are both more eloquent and efficient. for example reversing an arm bar is relatively simple in kungfu while some people may consider it to have no counter at all.
its the kungfu philosophy of being able to grasp the fluid that causes this unstop able nature this does not mean that a grappler would in a fight get beat by a kungfu fighter often the opposite is true mostly skill is what matters but kungfu has advantages . a kungfu fighter grows more powerful as he ages if he practices meditation and chi kung. i would much rather be pitted against a 20 year old wong kiew kit then the one who walks the earth in this present time. note both of them would so greatly surpass me that this would be futile embarrassing shameful and comical. the point is that a kungfu fighter has no prime age if anything that is really what makes kungfu so wonderful for me, never will i have to stop progressing.
also avoid the mere word tradition because kungfu is a living art that is advancing as we speak its not primitive or under developed or we would surely throw it away. low stances for example are both pointed or having a point or purpose and beautiful but the latter is mere coincedence. stances ground you more effectively and help with mobility and range also by lowering the body you help the hands to be able to work in high middle and low ranges. this is self evident.
someone mentioned that compassion and deadly techniques are an obvious contradiction and i would also like to say that this is perceptual and relative. if someone is robbing a bank and you have the option to save lives using a deadly attack to end the assailants life then it is both bad and good compassionate and cruel. death is always sad but you must stop what may be the deaths of many when a murderer is shown compassion with no justice. there is balance this way you see .
back onto grappling what makes people think a kungfu fighter couldn't grapple as a counter to a grappling attack this is a misconception i would advice anyone desiring to argue against this to look around shaolin wahnams website theyre wondeful only ingnorance could show otherwise and thats simple truth. wong kiew kit could most certainly defeat anyone in the ufc as he has developed an art called cosmos palm which would allow a simple touch of his hand to kill. of course he has no need for competition glory or cruelty.
i love competition personally but the pride that is associated with high level competition is both silly and unhealthy for meaningful relationships in and out of the martial arts world
xie xie
tsaijin
yizhichanlohan@gmail.com
7043147222
i teach for free!!!!!!!!!!!
it will seem ridiculous to some that shaolin has metaphysical properties of healing and harming sometimes with no physical contact made. one such skill is the one finger zen or yi zhi chan obviously a skill like this would be an excellent answer to all martial arts grapplers and kungfu experts included. if a grappler were to train tiger claw it would greatly enhance his grappling so separation is not necessarily key to victory however kungfu has the largest repertoire of throws and grappling techniques found in the world today they are not as often in kungfu sparring but this is partially due to the lack of real kungfu today.
im not certain but would a grappler admit that twisting the neck of a person trying to shoot would be sufficient to secure victory?(a grapplers shoot not a gun shoot lol)
ufc fighters could beat me, ufc fighters could especially fight me in there rule based surroundings but give me a few years , i'm 18 now, and i may enter the ufc. skills that they are unaccustomed too would include iron leg iron arm iron head things that i practice and of course internal force great enough to do things that i feel no need to comment on but i assure you are if nothing else baffling. the problem it seems is people are to caught up on if kungfu is better. whats the gauge?
if the gauge is completeness then kungfu is the most complete; it features more of everything. from skills to grappling tecniques to jumping high if you so desire kungfu is the most complete including twelve punching techniques more than any other art 12 throws 36 kicks 32 elbow attacks 118 joint locks you could go on and on.
is the scale its purpose? then kungfu is superior because its not only for fighting if this was the only point then carry a gun self defense would be yours to have.
is your gauge the fastest strike or the strongest grip or is it who can more effectively perform a kata or get into the mount position?
regardless of the gauge or scale for measuring you have to understand because of the unbroken chinese cultural timeline and a culture revolving around fighting arts it becomes easy to see that chinese arts would be more advanced. but talking about it means nothing. not wanting to brag i wont say how long each day but shaolin is my life i am an amateur instructor and thus i must stay on the top of my game for my students which means quite alot of training. one thing any good fighter needs is passion regardless of the fighting style.
i guess one good gauge is to say if your opponent is not vastly superior which art will give you a higher chance of surviving, then thats kungfu hands down. in the basic 16 combat sequences of shaolin wahnam in fact in the first two sequences you find two fatal attacks; a heart strike and a throat or eye strike. if you are met with a unwitting even martial arts opponent and you strike his throat then you most certainly would win that leads me to me practice shaolin.
if any grappler trained in kungfu it could only help their grappling and the reverse is also true because training is training however i wouldnt do bjj because i already have from the time i was six till i was twelve and kungfu answers to the bjj tecniques are both more eloquent and efficient. for example reversing an arm bar is relatively simple in kungfu while some people may consider it to have no counter at all.
its the kungfu philosophy of being able to grasp the fluid that causes this unstop able nature this does not mean that a grappler would in a fight get beat by a kungfu fighter often the opposite is true mostly skill is what matters but kungfu has advantages . a kungfu fighter grows more powerful as he ages if he practices meditation and chi kung. i would much rather be pitted against a 20 year old wong kiew kit then the one who walks the earth in this present time. note both of them would so greatly surpass me that this would be futile embarrassing shameful and comical. the point is that a kungfu fighter has no prime age if anything that is really what makes kungfu so wonderful for me, never will i have to stop progressing.
also avoid the mere word tradition because kungfu is a living art that is advancing as we speak its not primitive or under developed or we would surely throw it away. low stances for example are both pointed or having a point or purpose and beautiful but the latter is mere coincedence. stances ground you more effectively and help with mobility and range also by lowering the body you help the hands to be able to work in high middle and low ranges. this is self evident.
someone mentioned that compassion and deadly techniques are an obvious contradiction and i would also like to say that this is perceptual and relative. if someone is robbing a bank and you have the option to save lives using a deadly attack to end the assailants life then it is both bad and good compassionate and cruel. death is always sad but you must stop what may be the deaths of many when a murderer is shown compassion with no justice. there is balance this way you see .
back onto grappling what makes people think a kungfu fighter couldn't grapple as a counter to a grappling attack this is a misconception i would advice anyone desiring to argue against this to look around shaolin wahnams website theyre wondeful only ingnorance could show otherwise and thats simple truth. wong kiew kit could most certainly defeat anyone in the ufc as he has developed an art called cosmos palm which would allow a simple touch of his hand to kill. of course he has no need for competition glory or cruelty.
i love competition personally but the pride that is associated with high level competition is both silly and unhealthy for meaningful relationships in and out of the martial arts world
xie xie
tsaijin
yizhichanlohan@gmail.com
7043147222
i teach for free!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment