Thanks for a humble reply.
i understand, I have said much of what I wanted to talk about anyways. I have clarified most of my posts, I don't think there is a need. Good luck with the training everyone.
Both inexperienced and the general public alike are "fickle" I can see why my posts might be a "danger." But I think you guys, the more experienced crowd can see that I am not trying to destroy or discredit anything. But every business, and organization needs to maintain the integrity of its teachings in some way or another, and I realize that this forum is more for those who fit within the context of the organizations teachings, and its own discussion. For outsiders, to comment and disagree, can have a great effect on the "fickle" denomination, not because the outsiders are correct or hold the answers, but rather because of the lack of experience of the "fickle" viewer. Especially if the "outsiders" can convey thoughts, and reply to attacks in an efficient manner. Although I think some were too aggressive in their "corrections."
I see the intention and purpose for this thread, but I do not agree with the representation of my posts.In many cases it is outright false, and completely misleading of what I was trying to convey. And I realize alot of that is my fault, which is why I have apologized and tried to form different ways of expressing my opinion.
But there is no need anymore. O
i understand, I have said much of what I wanted to talk about anyways. I have clarified most of my posts, I don't think there is a need. Good luck with the training everyone.
Both inexperienced and the general public alike are "fickle" I can see why my posts might be a "danger." But I think you guys, the more experienced crowd can see that I am not trying to destroy or discredit anything. But every business, and organization needs to maintain the integrity of its teachings in some way or another, and I realize that this forum is more for those who fit within the context of the organizations teachings, and its own discussion. For outsiders, to comment and disagree, can have a great effect on the "fickle" denomination, not because the outsiders are correct or hold the answers, but rather because of the lack of experience of the "fickle" viewer. Especially if the "outsiders" can convey thoughts, and reply to attacks in an efficient manner. Although I think some were too aggressive in their "corrections."
I see the intention and purpose for this thread, but I do not agree with the representation of my posts.In many cases it is outright false, and completely misleading of what I was trying to convey. And I realize alot of that is my fault, which is why I have apologized and tried to form different ways of expressing my opinion.
But there is no need anymore. O
Comment